← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete Cotton Bounty (Yarn) Regulations C1926L00151 · 1926
Summary

Regulations governing a bounty/subsidy program for cotton yarn production or export

Reason

Subsidies distort market signals, misallocate capital, create inefficiency, burden taxpayers, and foster rent-seeking. Cotton yarn producers should compete on merit without government intervention.

delete Post and Telegraph Regulations 1913 (Amendment) C1926L00150 · 1926
Summary

Historical regulations from 1913 governing postal and telegraph services, with a 2014 amendment, establishing state control over communications infrastructure and service delivery

Reason

These century-old regulations represent government monopoly thinking incompatible with free market telecommunications. They impose compliance burdens, stifle competition, and prevent private innovation in an industry that has thrived on deregulation globally. The original 1913 framework assumes state control over communications infrastructure - a concept rejected by free market economics as it creates artificial barriers, distorts incentives, and prevents wealth creation through voluntary exchange.

delete Dried Fruits Export Control (Election of Board) Regulations (Amendment) C1926L00149 · 1926
Summary

Amendment to Dried Fruits Export Control Regulations governing the election process for board members of the body overseeing dried fruit exports.

Reason

Export marketing boards create monopolistic structures that distort market signals, impose forced levies on producers, restrict trade, and reduce competitiveness. Board election mechanisms perpetuate industry cartellisation rather than genuine governance. Such marketing arrangements harm Australian producers and consumers by artificially constraining output and raising prices, with compliance costs borne disproportionately by regional producers.

delete Regulations Governing the Formation, Control and Management of Rifle Clubs and Rifle Associations (Amendment) C1926L00148 · 1926
Summary

Regulation governing the formation, control, and management of rifle clubs and rifle associations. Likely imposes licensing requirements, operational standards, reporting obligations, and government oversight on these voluntary associations.

Reason

Imposes significant compliance costs and bureaucratic burden on voluntary sporting associations, stifling participation and diverting resources from core activities. Existing criminal and tort law already address legitimate safety concerns; this regulation creates a compliance maze with no offsetting public benefit that cannot be achieved through less restrictive means.

delete Commonwealth Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C1926L00147 · 1926
Summary

Amends the Commonwealth Public Service Regulations to modify provisions relating to employment conditions, classification, and management of Australian Public Service employees.

Reason

The amendment entrenches a separate employment regime that restricts freedom of contract, imposes bureaucratic costs, and creates a two-tier labor market. These regulations divert resources from productive use and undermine efficiency, with negligible benefit over a flexible, market-based approach.

delete Post and Telegraph Regulations 1913 (Amendment) C1926L00146 · 1926
Summary

Amendment to Post and Telegraph Regulations 1913, registered 2014-08-22, modifying regulations governing postal and telegraph services originally enacted over a century ago. These regulations historically governed licensing, operational requirements, and compliance obligations for postal and telegraph operators and users.

Reason

Post and telegraph regulations from 1913 reflect a bygone era of government monopoly control over communications. Such regulations typically impose licensing barriers, compliance costs, and restrictions that: (1) protect incumbent operators from competition, (2) add costs to businesses and consumers, (3) restrict entry for innovative communications services, and (4) layer new amendments onto century-old restrictions already obsolete. The 2014 amendment延续了这些束缚而非解除它们。Australians would be better served by modernized, competition-friendly communications regulation rather than perpetuating 1913-era controls.

delete Defence Retirement Regulations 1922 C1926L00145 · 1926
Summary

Regulation establishing a defined benefit retirement scheme for Australian Defence Force members, covering eligibility, benefit calculations, and administration.

Reason

The scheme imposes unsustainable unfunded liabilities, distorts labour incentives, compels compulsory wealth transfers violating property rights, and creates intergenerational inequity; repeal would allow market-based retirement solutions.

delete Aerial Navigation Regulations C1926L00144 · 1926
Summary

Regulations governing pilot licensing, aircraft certification, air traffic control, and operational standards to ensure safety and order in Australian airspace.

Reason

The regulations impose high compliance costs, create barriers to entry, and delay innovation in aviation, increasing prices and reducing supply of services—particularly harming remote communities that rely on air transport. Unseen effects include stifling competition, technological advancement, and creating a government monopoly on air traffic control that could be better provided by market-driven solutions.

delete Australian Military Regulations 1916 (Amendment) C1926L00143 · 1926
Summary

Australian Military Regulations 1916 (Amendment) registered 21 August 2014. Full text not provided, preventing detailed analysis of purpose, scope, and key mechanisms.

Reason

Military regulations inherently expand state power over individuals and often duplicate civilian law, imposing hidden compliance costs and restricting liberty. The 1916 base reflects an era of expansive government intervention. Even if some provisions are necessary for defense, the entire framework lacks modern, transparent, minimal design and should be repealed and replaced with a lean statute after rigorous cost-benefit analysis. The absence of provided content itself signals opacity typical of burdensome regulatory regimes.

delete Post and Telegraph Regulations 1913 (Amendment) C1926L00142 · 1926
Summary

Amendment to the Post and Telegraph Regulations 1913, updating provisions related to postal and telegraph services.

Reason

Obsolete framework: the 1913 Regulations are archaic, superseded by modern laws. This amendment perpetuates unnecessary compliance costs and legal complexity without contemporary benefit.

delete Post and Telegraph Regulations 1913 (Amendment) C1926L00141 · 1926
Summary

Amendment to the Post and Telegraph Regulations 1913, updating provisions governing postal and telegraph services.

Reason

These century-old regulations impose unnecessary compliance costs, create barriers to entry, and distort market competition in the communications sector. They are anachronistic and inhibit the innovation and efficiency that a free market would provide.

delete Regulations Governing the Formation, Control and Management of Rifle Clubs and Rifle Associations (Amendment) C1926L00139 · 1926
Summary

Federal regulations controlling the formation, control, and management of rifle clubs and rifle associations, including membership requirements, governance structures, operational standards, and compliance obligations for clubs to operate legally. The instrument is an amendment to existing 2006 regulations.

Reason

This regulation represents government control over private voluntary associations, creating barriers to entry, compliance costs, and administrative burden that distort the market for shooting sports. Controls on formation and management of private clubs are inconsistent with liberty and property rights principles. Without the actual document content, the title alone indicates the kind of管制 that creates monopolistic conditions for incumbent clubs and restricts competition and free association in this recreational sector. Compliance costs are particularly burdensome for small or regional clubs.

delete Commonwealth Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C1926L00138 · 1926
Summary

Commonwealth Public Service Regulations (Amendment) 2014 - subordinate legislation under the Public Service Act 1999 governing employment conditions, hiring, promotion, termination and conditions for federal public servants. Establishes bureaucratic procedures, merit protections, and employment safeguards for government workers.

Reason

Public service employment regulations create structural rigidities that distort labor markets, protect insider workers at taxpayers' expense, and impose compliance costs without commensurate benefits. General employment law adequately addresses legitimate concerns about unfair dismissal and merit-based selection. These regulations create an insider/outsider dynamic in the federal workforce, with iron rice bowl protections that reduce accountability and efficiency. The regulations fund a self-perpetuating bureaucratic class whose interests are served by maintaining these restrictions, rather than serving the public interest.

delete Commonwealth Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C1926L00137 · 1926
Summary

Amendment to the Commonwealth Public Service Regulations, which govern employment, conduct, and administrative processes within the Australian Public Service.

Reason

Increases bureaucratic red tape within government, raising compliance costs and reducing flexibility in managing public servants; unseen effects include distorted incentives, slower decision-making, and diversion of resources from frontline services to administrative overhead.

delete Commonwealth Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C1926L00136 · 1926
Summary

Amends the Commonwealth Public Service Regulations, governing employment conditions, classification, and workforce management for Australian Public Service employees.

Reason

Public service regulations distort labor markets, increase taxpayer costs, and reduce management flexibility. This amendment perpetuates those harms, creating unseen consequences: misallocation of talent, stifled innovation, and higher compliance burdens. Repealing it would restore market discipline and reduce government overreach.