← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete War Financial Regulations (Amendment) C1917L00241 · 1917
Summary

Amendment to War Financial Regulations, likely expanding emergency financial controls, reporting requirements, or transaction restrictions during wartime/emergency periods.

Reason

Regulations with 'war' in title typically represent emergency powers that become permanent, imposing disproportionate compliance costs on financial institutions and businesses while offering questionable marginal security benefits. These controls distort market efficiency, invade financial privacy, and create barriers to international capital flows essential for prosperity. The 2014 amendment likely perpetuated or expanded outdated wartime measures that should have lapsed, burdening Australians through higher financial service costs and reduced economic dynamism.

delete War Precautions (Coal) Regulations (Amendment) C1917L00240 · 1917
Summary

Amends regulations granting the government wartime powers to control coal production, distribution, and pricing for national security purposes.

Reason

Perpetuates extraordinary government control over a vital industry, distorting markets, imposing compliance costs, and infringing property rights. Unseen effects include regulatory capture, reduced investment, and entrenched central planning that harms Australia's competitiveness and prosperity.

delete War Financial Regulations (Amendment) C1917L00239 · 1917
Summary

Amendment to War Financial Regulations, likely relating to financial controls, reporting requirements, or administrative procedures for wartime financial management. The instrument dates from 2014 but references war-related financial frameworks that originate from earlier eras.

Reason

War Financial Regulations are inherently tied to wartime conditions that no longer exist in modern Australia. Such regulations impose compliance costs and administrative burdens without any corresponding current benefit, as Australia has not operated under wartime financial conditions for decades. Outdated war-era regulations create unnecessary regulatory complexity and should be deleted.

keep Australian Military Regulations 1916 (Amendment) C1917L00238 · 1917
Summary

Amendment to Australian Military Regulations 1916, registered on 21 August 2014. Presumably updates military regulations governing service conditions, discipline, and procedures for the Australian Defence Force, likely reflecting modernised defence requirements while maintaining continuity with longstanding 1916 regulatory framework.

Reason

Military regulations governing defence force governance, discipline, and operations represent a core government function necessary for national security. Unlike civilian regulatory burden which typically distorts market incentives and creates compliance costs, military regulations govern the unique employer-employee relationship of armed forces where hierarchical discipline and standardised procedures are essential to operational effectiveness and national defence capability. Deletion would create a regulatory vacuum in defence force governance without market mechanisms to fill this void.

keep Australian Military Regulations 1916 (Amendment) C1917L00237 · 1917
Summary

The Australian Military Regulations 1916 (Amendment) governs discipline, operations, and administration of the Australian Defence Force, providing a legal framework for military conduct and readiness.

Reason

Deletion would dismantle the essential legal foundation for military discipline, operational command, and force readiness, directly compromising Australia's ability to defend its sovereignty and citizens—a function that cannot be replaced by private market mechanisms.

delete War Financial Regulations (Amendment) C1917L00236 · 1917
Summary

Amendment to War Financial Regulations - a 2014 modification to financial regulations originally designed for wartime conditions, presumably addressing financial controls, restrictions on capital flows, currency controls, or similar emergency economic measures

Reason

War Financial Regulations are inherently designed for wartime conditions. Australia was not in a state of war in 2014 when this amendment was registered, making it a peacetime modification of wartime controls. Such regulations impose ongoing compliance costs, distort economic decision-making, and create regulatory uncertainty even when dormant. Regulations designed for wartime emergencies that persist into peacetime accumulate unnecessary regulatory burden without demonstrated benefit in current conditions. The costs of maintaining these regulations include compliance reading, legal uncertainty, and potential distortion of capital allocation - all without clear justification when Australia faces no wartime financial emergency.

delete War Financial Regulations (Amendment) C1917L00235 · 1917
Summary

Amendment to War Financial Regulations, a regime imposing extraordinary financial controls during wartime. Without access to the full instrument, likely involves restrictions on foreign exchange, capital controls, gold holdings, financial transactions, and related emergency economic measures originally enacted during a period of war.

Reason

Emergency wartime financial regulations inevitably become permanent, creating ongoing distortions to capital allocation, cross-border investment, and financial innovation. The unseen costs include: prolonged capital flight and reduced investment attractiveness; arbitrary enforcement discretion; compliance burdens that fall disproportionately on smaller institutions; and the moral hazard of concentrating financial power in government hands 'just in case.' Even if the original war is long over, these regulations distort wealth creation and should be repealed. If the amendment merely updates technical details, the entire framework remains illegitimate—the proper approach is repeal, not maintenance.

delete War Precautions (Galvanized Iron) Regulations 1917 C1917L00234 · 1917
Summary

1917 wartime regulation controlling galvanized iron during World War I under emergency powers. Imposed restrictions on production, distribution, or use of galvanized iron for war purposes. Moribund instrument from a specific historical emergency context.

Reason

A century-old wartime intervention with zero relevance to modern Australia. Keeping archaic emergency controls on the books creates regulatory clutter, legal uncertainty, and trivial compliance costs for no benefit. Original wartime distortions of property rights and markets should be fully excised from the statute book. The unseen cost is maintaining the precedent that such interventions can linger indefinitely, undermining legal certainty and the rule of law.

delete War Precautions (Control of Sports) Regulations 1917 C1917L00233 · 1917
Summary

These 1917 regulations empowered the government to control sports and sporting events during World War I, as a wartime measure to conserve resources and manpower.

Reason

Obsolete wartime regulation that violates liberty and property rights by dictating sports activities. No longer serves any legitimate purpose; keeping it would be an unnecessary burden and a threat to freedom.

delete War Precautions (Sheepskins) Regulations 1916 (Amendment) C1917L00232 · 1917
Summary

Regulation concerning the control and production of sheepskins under war powers, originally enacted in 1916 and amended in 2014. The amendment likely updated or maintained provisions related to sheepskin acquisition, processing, or distribution during wartime conditions.

Reason

This is an archaic wartime regulation from 1916, amended in 2014 but still framed around 'War Precautions'. Australia is not at war, and the continued existence of such emergency powers on the statute books creates unnecessary compliance costs, judicial confusion, and the risk of misuse. Wartime powers should naturally expire with the conflict; this relic should be repealed entirely.

delete War Precautions (Wool) Regulations 1916 (Amendment) C1917L00231 · 1917
Summary

Wartime regulations from 1916 establishing controls on wool during World War I, including pricing, requisitioning, and trading restrictions. Though amended over time, the fundamental framework addresses WWI-era economic controls that have been obsolete for nearly a century.

Reason

This regulation is a WWI-era instrument controlling wool that has been obsolete since 1918. Keeping a nearly-100-year-old wartime economic control mechanism serves no legitimate purpose in peacetime Australia. The compliance burden of maintaining such archaic instruments on the statute books provides zero benefit while contributing to regulatory clutter and confusion.

keep Financial and Allowance Regulations for the Australian Military Forces and Senior Cadets (Amendment) C1917L00230 · 1917
Summary

This amendment updates regulations governing financial allowances and payments for Australian Defence Force personnel and senior cadets, including pay scales, allowances, and related compensation mechanisms.

Reason

Australians would be worse off without this instrument because national defense requires standardized, centrally-managed compensation to ensure equitable treatment, operational readiness, and proper stewardship of public funds. Removing it would create chaos in military administration, undermine morale, and compromise Australia's security—outcomes no reasonable person would accept. The regulation's benefits (cohesion, accountability, fairness) cannot be achieved through decentralized or privatized alternatives; defense is a core state function where uniform pay standards are essential.

delete War Precautions (Enemy Shareholders) Regulations 1916 (Amendment) C1917L00229 · 1917
Summary

A wartime regulation from 1916, amended in 2014, that restricts share ownership by 'enemy aliens' or enemy-controlled entities, imposing limitations on corporate shareholding based on nationality/geopolitical status.

Reason

This 1916 wartime relic represents exactly the kind of paternalistic, liberty-infringing regulation that creates unnecessary compliance costs while achieving no legitimate modern purpose. In a globalized economy, such restrictions deter foreign investment, distort capital flows, and impose arbitrary barriers based on archaic 'enemy' classifications that have no place in peacetime commerce. The 2014 amendment itself demonstrates bureaucratic inertia keeping outdated controls alive; repeal would immediately improve Australia's investment attractiveness while eliminating a pointless constraint on property rights and economic freedom.

delete War Precautions (Glycerine) Regulations 1916 (Amendment) C1917L00228 · 1917
Summary

This instrument amended the War Precautions (Glycerine) Regulations 1916, originally enacted during World War I to control glycerine (a precursor to explosives) due to wartime security concerns. The amendment appears to have been registered in 2014 but preserves regulations rooted in WWI-era emergency powers.

Reason

This regulation traces to World War I emergency powers from 1916, making it over 105 years old and wholly obsolete. Wars end, and so must the wartime administrative machinery. Glycerine is now a commonplace industrial chemical used in food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics—controlled through modern regulatory frameworks rather than century-old war precautions. Maintaining this instrument creates compliance uncertainty, potential criminal liability for entirely innocent commercial activities, and perpetuates the dangerous precedent of permanent wartime administrative powers in peacetime. Australians are better served by deleting this relic of a conflict that ended generations ago.

delete Entertainments Tax Regulations 1917 C1917L00227 · 1917
Summary

Imposes a tax on entertainment activities including theatrical performances, concerts, and sporting events, requiring operators to collect and remit tax to the government.

Reason

Entertainment taxes distort market signals, reduce demand for cultural activities, impose burdensome compliance costs on businesses, and constitute paternalistic interference in voluntary transactions. This 1917-era framework likely outlived its justification and creates deadweight loss while raising revenue through a highly distortionary mechanism that could be replaced with less economically damaging alternatives.