← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete Taxation Administration Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) F2002B00102 · 2002
Summary

Amends the Taxation Administration Regulations 2002 to modify administrative requirements for tax compliance, assessment, or enforcement.

Reason

Increases administrative burden and compliance costs on businesses and individuals, creating deadweight losses and potential duplication with state tax systems; such complexity distorts incentives and reduces economic liberty without clear justification.

delete Income Tax Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 3) F2002B00101 · 2002
Summary

Amendment to income tax regulations, likely modifying rates, thresholds, or compliance obligations under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.

Reason

Adds complexity and compliance burden, distorting economic incentives and imposing unseen costs on taxpayers. Repealing reduces government interference in voluntary transactions.

delete Patents Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 2) F2002B00100 · 2002
Summary

Amendment to the Patents Regulations 2002 (No. 2) affecting patent application processes or substantive criteria.

Reason

Adding to patent regulatory burden raises costs for innovators, particularly small firms, and creates legal uncertainty. Unseen effects include reduced patenting activity and slower technology transfer, harming economic growth.

delete Customs Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 2) F2002B00098 · 2002
Summary

Cannot determine: Only metadata provided (title, registration date) without actual regulatory content. The 'Customs Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 2)' is identified but its provisions, mechanisms, and scope are unknown.

Reason

The instrument appears to be a regulatory amendment that likely adds complexity to customs procedures. Without seeing the text, any amendment from 2002 would add compliance burden to trade and cross-border activities. If it was substantive enough to merit registration, it probably restricts liberty, increases costs, or creates barriers to voluntary exchange. In the absence of evidence of a critical, irreplaceable function protecting life, liberty, or property from aggression, the default presumption must be deletion. The burden of proof for retaining regulation rests on demonstrating that its benefits outweigh its hidden costs—which cannot be done with no documentation.

delete Superannuation (CSS) Continuing Contributions for Benefits Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) F2002B00093 · 2002
Summary

2002 amendment to superannuation regulations governing continuing contributions for benefits under the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS), likely detailing when and how contributions must persist after benefit commencement.

Reason

Obsolescent technical regulation that compounds unnecessary complexity in the mandatory superannuation system, increasing compliance costs for employers and funds. The regime itself coerces savings, distorts labor markets, and reduces take-home pay; this amendment adds further bureaucratic burden without clear benefit. Repeal would reduce red tape and restore individual liberty over retirement planning.

delete Indian Ocean Territories Redundant Regulations (Repeal) Regulations 2002 F2002B00092 · 2002
Summary

This instrument, made in 2002 and registered in 2005, repeals various regulations deemed redundant for Australia's Indian Ocean Territories (likely Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands). It is a housekeeping measure to remove outdated legislative provisions.

Reason

Obsolete instrument that serves no active purpose; it merely records a repeal that has already taken effect. Retaining such historical clutter undermines legislative simplicity and adds to the accumulation of unnecessary legal texts, contrary to the principles of minimal government intervention.

delete Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 2) F2002B00090 · 2002
Summary

Amends the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations to modify supervision requirements for superannuation funds, including changes to governance, investment standards, and reporting obligations.

Reason

Imposes unnecessary compliance costs, distorting investment decisions and increasing fees for members; its objectives could be achieved through market discipline and existing laws, making it redundant red tape.

delete Retirement Savings Accounts Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 3) F2002B00089 · 2002
Summary

Amends regulations governing Retirement Savings Accounts, modifying contribution limits, preservation rules, and administrative requirements for retirement savings in Australia.

Reason

Paternalistic mandate that restricts individual liberty, imposes significant compliance costs on providers and savers, and distorts market competition. Unseen consequences include higher fees, reduced innovation, and forced savings structures that may not suit individual circumstances.

delete Public Employment (Consequential and Transitional) Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) F2002B00086 · 2002
Summary

Consequential and transitional amendment to public employment regulations, likely implementing changes to public service legislation with temporary provisions.

Reason

This 2002 transitional instrument almost certainly imposes ongoing compliance costs and legal complexity with no current benefit. Transitional provisions must be time-limited; persisting beyond their purpose creates unnecessary red tape, increasing administrative burden and stifling efficiency in public employment management.

delete Migration Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 2) F2002B00085 · 2002
Summary

Amendment to the Migration Regulations 1958, likely modifying visa categories, eligibility criteria, or procedural requirements for migration to Australia.

Reason

Violates principles of free movement and individual liberty; creates bureaucratic barriers that separate families, restrict economic opportunity, and generate significant compliance costs. The regulation's restrictions cause greater harm through lost productivity, black markets, and human suffering than any purported benefits. In a free society, movement across borders should be unrestricted.

delete Airports (Ownership — Interests in Shares) Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) F2002B00081 · 2002
Summary

Amends regulations governing foreign ownership of Australian airports, setting limits on interests in shares held by non-Australian entities to safeguard national control of critical infrastructure.

Reason

Foreign ownership restrictions artificially limit capital inflows, reduce competitive pressure, and inflate costs for airport infrastructure. They protect incumbents at the expense of consumers and economic efficiency. The national security rationale is weak and can be addressed via targeted, transparent screening rather than blanket ownership caps. Unseen costs include foregone investment, higher passenger fees, and slower infrastructure upgrades.

keep Customs (Prohibited Imports) Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 2) F2002B00080 · 2002
Summary

Amendment to the Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations updating the list of goods banned from entry into Australia, typically covering weapons, illicit drugs, biosecurity risks, sanctioned items, and goods threatening national security.

Reason

A pre-import prohibition framework is essential to prevent dangerous goods from entering Australia en masse; without it, border screening would be ineffective given daily trade volumes, exposing citizens to heightened risks from weapons, drugs, and biosecurity threats that post-entry enforcement alone cannot adequately address.

keep Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) F2002B00077 · 2002
Summary

Amends the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Arrangement to streamline recognition of goods, services, and professional qualifications between Australia and New Zealand, reducing cross-border regulatory barriers and duplication.

Reason

It reduces trade and occupational barriers, increases economic integration, and lowers compliance costs for businesses and professionals operating across the Tasman. Deleting it would reinstate costly, duplicative recognition requirements and limit market access.

keep Statutory Declarations Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) F2002B00069 · 2002
Summary

Amends regulations governing statutory declarations - legally binding statements used to verify facts in legal, administrative, and commercial contexts.

Reason

Australians would face higher transaction costs and uncertainty without this efficient verification mechanism. Statutory declarations reduce coordination costs by allowing verified statements in lieu of direct testimony, a function difficult to replicate otherwise.

delete Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) F2002B00068 · 2002
Summary

Amendment to the Primary Industries Levies and Charges Collection Regulations, modifying procedures for collecting mandatory levies and charges from primary industry operators such as farmers, miners, and fisheries.

Reason

Strengthens the framework for extracting mandatory levies, increasing compliance costs and administrative burdens on productive sectors; distorts market incentives, reduces competitiveness, and disproportionately harms rural and remote businesses already disadvantaged by distance. The revenue could be raised more efficiently through general taxation or voluntary industry funding.