← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04386 · 1980
Summary

Amends the Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations to adjust salary rates and allowances for military personnel

Reason

Military compensation requires structured statutory basis to ensure fair pay and recruitment/retention; removing this would create administrative chaos and inequitable pay distribution

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04385 · 1980
Summary

Amendment to the Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations 2009, establishing salary scales, allowances, and payment conditions for Australian Defence Force members.

Reason

Deletion would compromise national security by harming recruitment, retention, and operational readiness. The regulation provides a transparent, consistent framework for military compensation that would be difficult to replicate through ad hoc decisions, preventing inequities and maintaining discipline.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04384 · 1980
Summary

Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) - Federal instrument regulating compensation, allowances, and salary structures for Australian Defence Force personnel. Registered 2009-05-18.

Reason

Military salary regulations are internal government compensation instruments that do not impose compliance costs on private businesses, distort markets, or restrict liberty in any meaningful way. While government employment compensation could theoretically be more efficiently determined through market mechanisms, deleting this instrument would not improve Australian prosperity, liberty or competitiveness - it would simply leave defence salary arrangements undefined without any meaningful liberalisation of markets. The instrument imposes negligible regulatory burden compared to instruments affecting housing affordability, resource development, or occupational licensing which are the true drivers of Australia's competitive decline.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04383 · 1980
Summary

Amendments to Defence Force salary regulations, establishing pay structures, allowances, and compensation frameworks for Australian Defence Force personnel.

Reason

Military salary regulations ensure fair, structured compensation for personnel in dangerous service roles essential to national security. Removing these regulations would create arbitrary pay setting, undermine recruitment and retention of skilled defence personnel, and could damage force morale and readiness. Unlike typical regulatory burdens on private enterprise, defence force salary structures address legitimate government employment requirements where centralised pay frameworks serve the public interest.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04382 · 1980
Summary

Regulation establishing salaries, allowances, and conditions for Australian Defence Force personnel, ensuring standardized compensation based on rank and service.

Reason

Deleting it would compromise national security by undermining morale, retention, and recruitment; regulated pay ensures fairness and consistency in a state monopoly where market mechanisms cannot function.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04381 · 1980
Summary

Amends the Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations to modify pay rates, allowances, and related entitlements for Australian Defence Force members.

Reason

Deletion would risk outdated pay scales, harming recruitment, retention, and operational readiness, thereby compromising national security—a prerequisite for liberty and prosperity. The regulated framework ensures equitable compensation for a volunteer force, a public good that markets cannot efficiently provide.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04380 · 1980
Summary

Amends regulations determining salaries, allowances, and related remuneration for Australian Defence Force members, setting the framework for military pay.

Reason

Deleting this instrument would create legal uncertainty, disrupt defence personnel compensation, and harm morale, retention, and national security. The structured regulatory framework ensures consistent, equitable, and predictable remuneration, which would be difficult to replicate through alternative ad hoc arrangements.

delete Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04379 · 1980
Summary

Federal regulations establishing salary structures, classifications, and pay rates for Australian Defence Force personnel, including provisions for various ranks, service categories, and associated allowances and benefits.

Reason

Military salary regulations determine compensation for government employees through a bureaucratic structure rather than market forces. The actual payment of Defence Force personnel derives from parliamentary appropriations, not these regulations—deleting them would not prevent Australia from paying its defence personnel but would remove an unnecessary layer of administrative rigidity. Market competition for defence talent, combined with transparent parliamentary budget processes, would better serve both taxpayers and service members without creating compliance overhead that serves no productive economic purpose.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04378 · 1980
Summary

Federal regulations setting pay scales, allowances, and salary structures for Australian Defence Force personnel, including service classifications, promotion-based increases, and special payments for particular duties or conditions.

Reason

Defence Force salaries are internal government compensation structures for core government employees performing essential national defense functions. Unlike typical regulatory instruments that distort private markets, this governs remuneration for government employees in a legitimate constitutional role. Deletion would create administrative chaos without improving economic liberty — military personnel require structured compensation frameworks, and alternative mechanisms (market wages) are inappropriate for defining public servant pay in a constitutional democracy. The costs of deletion (workforce instability, recruitment failures in essential defense roles) far exceed any theoretical market distortion from keeping it.

delete Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04377 · 1980
Summary

Amends the Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations to modify pay rates, allowances, and salary-related conditions for members of the Australian Defence Force.

Reason

This amendment adds unnecessary regulatory complexity and rigidity to defence personnel compensation. Salary adjustments could be handled more efficiently through internal defence budget determinations, allowing faster, market-responsive changes without the overhead of legislative amendment. Keeping this instrument perpetuates a burdensome regulatory layer that increases administrative costs, distorts incentives, and contributes to the growth of government spending without demonstrable gains in defence capability or national security.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04376 · 1980
Summary

Amends Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations to adjust salary structures and compensation for Australian Defence Force members, establishing frameworks for pay rates, allowances, and related conditions.

Reason

Deleting would create salary uncertainty, risking ADF recruitment, retention, and morale, thereby compromising national security. The regulatory framework provides necessary certainty and transparency for a core government function that cannot be effectively delegated to market mechanisms.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04375 · 1980
Summary

Amendment to regulations governing salaries and compensation for Australian Defence Force personnel, establishing pay scales, allowances, and related financial entitlements.

Reason

Defence force compensation is a core government function affecting national security. Deleting salary regulations would create legal uncertainty for military personnel and undermine recruitment/retention. Unlike economic regulations that distort markets and create compliance burdens, this internal administrative framework provides necessary predictability for those serving in uniform. The absence of such regulations would harm Australians by weakening defence readiness and potentially jeopardizing the security that underpins all prosperity.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04374 · 1980
Summary

Amends the Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations to adjust salary scales, allowances, and other remuneration for members of the Australian Defence Force.

Reason

Australians would be worse off without a consistent legal framework for military compensation, as it ensures fairness, maintains morale and readiness, and supports national security. The regulations achieve this outcome in a transparent, administratively efficient way that would be hard to replicate through alternative mechanisms.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04373 · 1980
Summary

Amendment to regulations governing salaries and compensation for Australian Defence Force personnel, adjusting pay scales, allowances, and related financial entitlements.

Reason

National defence is an essential, legitimate function of government. Removing salary regulations would undermine the ADF's ability to attract and retain skilled personnel through predictable, transparent compensation, directly threatening Australia's security and defence capability.

keep Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L04372 · 1980
Summary

Amendment to the Defence Force (Salaries) Regulations 2009, which sets salaries and allowances for Australian Defence Force members. This amendment adjusts compensation rates and conditions.

Reason

National defense is a legitimate core government function. Standardized, transparent military compensation ensures recruitment/retention of critical personnel and prevents arbitrary or politically-motivated pay decisions. Deleting would create uncertainty, risk morale collapse, and impair defense readiness—costs far exceeding any regulatory savings. This framework is essential for operational effectiveness.