← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete Historic Shipwrecks Regulations 1978 F1996B00828 · 1978
Summary

Protects historic shipwrecks and relics by prohibiting damage, interference, or removal without a permit; administers protection through permit requirements and enforcement under the Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976.

Reason

Imposes avoidable compliance costs on maritime industries, restricts property rights and liberty to engage in salvage or tourism, and yields dubious preservation benefits that could be better achieved through private ownership or market incentives.

delete Stevedoring Industry Levy Collection Regulations (Amendment) F1996B00311 · 1978
Summary

Amends regulations governing the collection of the stevedoring industry levy, adjusting levy assessment and payment procedures.

Reason

Imposes compliance costs on a vital export sector, creates administrative burden with minimal economic benefit, and distorts incentives without clear justification.

keep Superannuation (CSS) Transfer Arrangements Regulations F1996B00261 · 1978
Summary

Regulations governing the transfer of Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) benefits, establishing procedures, conditions, and protections for moving accrued superannuation entitlements between employers and funds, ensuring secure and orderly transfers.

Reason

Deleting these rules would remove safeguards for retirees, creating uncertainty and potential loss of benefits, making Australians worse off by weakening protections that are difficult to replace through market mechanisms.

delete Superannuation (CSS) Former Provident Account Contributors Regulations 1978 F1996B00186 · 1978
Summary

Regulates superannuation contributions for former provident account contributors to the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS), establishing rules for their eligibility and benefit calculations.

Reason

This regulation imposes unnecessary compliance costs on businesses and individuals, creating bureaucratic burdens without clear public benefit. Its original intent to protect contributors is now obsolete given modern superannuation frameworks, and it contributes to regulatory duplication and economic inefficiency. Australians would be better off without this outdated instrument, as it stifles economic freedom and adds to compliance costs without commensurate protection.

delete Superannuation (CSS) Former Contributors for Units of Pension Regulations F1996B00028 · 1978
Summary

Regulation governing former contributors to the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS), specifying eligibility and calculation methods for pension units.

Reason

Niche, technical regulation adding complexity to superannuation administration without demonstrated public benefit. Individual retirement arrangements can be handled through private contracts; government should not maintain specialized pension schemes that distort private savings decisions and create dependency on bureaucratic systems.

delete High Court Rules (Amendment) C2004L02374 · 1978
Summary

Amendment to the High Court Rules, registered in 2005, making procedural changes to the rules governing proceedings in the High Court of Australia.

Reason

Outdated standalone amendment likely superseded; retaining it adds complexity and confusion, increasing compliance costs for litigants and legal practitioners. Its removal would simplify the regulatory framework without impacting the court's ability to function, as the changes are already embedded in current rules.

keep High Court Rules (Amendment) C2004L02369 · 1978
Summary

Amends procedural rules for the High Court of Australia, governing processes like filings, hearings, and evidence handling.

Reason

Ensures orderly administration of justice at Australia's highest judicial level; removing it would cause procedural chaos and inefficiency in constitutional matters affecting national unity.

delete Superannuation (Additional Pension) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L01926 · 1978
Summary

Amendment to Superannuation Regulations providing for additional pension benefits, registered 2005. Instruments of this type expand mandated retirement savings schemes, imposing forced savings obligations and compliance requirements on employers and individuals.

Reason

Mandated superannuation schemes represent coercive interference in individual financial freedom. Australians would be better off with liberty to allocate their own income according to personal priorities rather than having the state dictate retirement savings contributions. Such schemes create compliance burdens, reduce individual choice, and often deliver suboptimal outcomes compared to voluntary private arrangements. Additional pension regulations expand this interference without clear evidence of net benefit.

delete Housing Loans Insurance Regulations C2004L01810 · 1978
Summary

Regulations governing housing loans insurance, likely covering capital requirements, premium calculations, and operational standards for mortgage insurers. Sets rules around risk assessment, claims processing, and consumer protections in the mortgage insurance market.

Reason

Government involvement in mortgage insurance distorts risk pricing, creates moral hazard by encouraging lenders to make riskier loans knowing they're insured, and raises compliance costs ultimately borne by homebuyers. Private mortgage insurance markets function efficiently without regulatory mandates; removing this allows competition to drive lower premiums and better service, improving housing affordability. The 'protection' rationale is outweighed by the unintended consequence of inflating housing prices through artificially increased lending capacity.

delete Dairying Industry Research and Promotion Levy Regulations (Amendment) C2004L01775 · 1978
Summary

Establishes a mandatory levy on dairy industry participants to fund research and promotional activities for the dairy sector. The levy is collected from producers and used to finance industry-wide marketing and R&D initiatives determined by the relevant industry body.

Reason

Violates property rights by forcing dairy producers to fund collective activities they may not support. Industry research and promotion can and should be provided voluntarily through trade associations or private collaboration, allowing market signals to guide resource allocation. The compulsory nature creates potential for regulatory capture, misallocation of resources, and distorts competition by socializing marketing costs.

delete Defence (Re-establishment Loans) Regulations (Amendment) C2004L01761 · 1978
Summary

Amendment to Defence (Re-establishment Loans) Regulations, providing subsidized loan facilities for eligible defence personnel to assist with re-establishment into civilian life after service. Covers loan terms, eligibility criteria, and administrative mechanisms for what appears to be a long-standing defence community support program.

Reason

Government-backed loan programs for specific occupational groups distort credit markets and create preferential treatment for defence personnel at taxpayers' expense. Such targeted subsidies pick winners and losers, penalizing other Australians who must service this program's costs without receiving its benefits. Private sector lending institutions are capable of offering transition financing to ex-defence personnel based on commercial merit. The instrument perpetuates a pattern of using public resources to solve problems better addressed through general liberty and competitive markets.

delete Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C2004L01537 · 1978
Summary

Amendment to the Public Service Regulations made in 2005, likely modifying rules governing Australian Public Service employment conditions, classification structures, codes of conduct, or agency administrative processes.

Reason

This 20-year‑old amendment is almost certainly obsolete, having been superseded by later legislative changes. Keeping it creates legal uncertainty, imposes unnecessary compliance burdens on public servants, and clutters the statute book with dead provisions. Even when enacted, such regulatory expansions typically added bureaucratic layers without clear efficiency gains, increasing administrative costs while producing negligible public benefit—contrary to principles of lean, accountable government.

delete Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C2004L01536 · 1978
Summary

Amendment to Public Service Regulations from 2005, likely modifying administrative procedures, employment conditions, or operational frameworks for Australian government agencies and public servants.

Reason

Creates unnecessary administrative burden and reduces operational flexibility in government agencies without clear public benefit; 2005 amendment likely adds complexity to public service management that could be achieved through simpler, more efficient means while maintaining accountability. The compliance costs and reduced adaptability represent significant unseen costs to taxpayers and government effectiveness.

delete Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C2004L01533 · 1978
Summary

An amendment to the Public Service Regulations, likely modifying employment conditions, classification structures, or performance management for Australian Public Service employees.

Reason

The amendment adds unnecessary regulatory complexity and compliance costs to public service operations, creating rigidity that hampers efficient workforce management and diverts resources from core service delivery. Such internal regulations often produce unintended consequences like reduced adaptability, stifled innovation, and increased administrative burden, ultimately diminishing the public service's effectiveness without delivering commensurate benefits.

delete Public Service Regulations (Amendment) C2004L01532 · 1978
Summary

Amendment to Australian Public Service Regulations, registered 2005-01-01, relating to workplace relations, employment conditions, and administrative requirements for federal public service employees

Reason

Public service employment regulations create implicit occupational licensing barriers, distort labor market signals, impose compliance costs that reduce departmental flexibility, and often replicate state-level employment laws. The 2005 amendment framework adds administrative burden without demonstrable productivity gains, restricts wage and placement flexibility, and exemplifies how regulatory layering in public sector employment reduces both worker welfare and service delivery efficiency.